Scrutinizing Clinical Biomarkers in a Large Cohort of Patients with Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne Infections.

Standard clinical markers can improve tick-borne infection (TBI) diagnoses. We investigated immune and other clinical biomarkers in 110 patients clinically diagnosed with TBIs before (T0) and after antibiotic treatment (T2). At T0, both the initial observation group and patients without seroconversion for tick-borne pathogens exhibited notably low percentages and counts of CD3 percentage (CD3%), CD3+ cells, CD8+ suppressors, CD4 percentage (CD4%), and CD4+ helper cells, with the latter group showing reductions in CD3%, CD3+, and CD8+ counts in approximately 15-22% of cases. Following treatment at the T2 follow-up, patients typically experienced enhancements in their previously low CD3%, CD3+ counts, CD4%, and CD4+ counts; however, there was no notable progress in their low CD8+ counts, and a higher number of patients presented with insufficient transferrin levels. Moreover, among those with negative serology for tick-borne infections, there was an improvement in low CD3% and CD3+ counts, which was more pronounced in patients with deficient transferrin amounts. Among those with CD57+ (n = 37) and CD19+ (n = 101) lymphocyte analysis, 59.46% of patients had a low CD57+ count, 14.85% had a low CD19 count, and 36.63% had a low CD19 percentage (CD19%). Similar findings were observed concerning low CD57+, CD19+, and CD19% markers for negative TBI serology patients. Overall, this study demonstrates that routine standard clinical markers could assist in a TBI diagnosis.

A Longitudinal Study of a Large Clinical Cohort of Patients with Lyme Disease and Tick-Borne Co-Infections Treated with Combination Antibiotics.

The rising prevalence of tick-borne infections (TBIs) necessitates further attention. This study retrospectively investigated the types of TBIs, symptoms, and if combination antibiotics were helpful within a patient cohort at an infectious disease clinic in Ireland. In this chart audit of 301 individuals (184 female, 117 male) tested for TBIs, 140 (46.51%) had positive antibody responses for TBIs from an ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoassay) that was based on a modified two-tiered testing protocol. A total of 93 (66.43%) patients had positive antibody responses to one TBI: 83 (59.29%) for Borrelia, 7 (5.00%) for Rickettsia, and 1 (0.71%) each for either Babesia, Bartonella, or Ehrlichia. The remaining 47 (33.57%) patients were infected with multiple TBIs. These patients were treated with combination antibiotics and monitored at two subsequent follow-ups. Only 2 of 101 patients (1.98%) had discontinued treatment by the second follow-up. In the first follow-up with 118 patients, 70 (59.32%) reported pain and 48 (40.68%) had neurological symptoms. In the next follow-up of 101 patients, 41 (40.59%) had pain while 30 (29.70%) had neurological symptoms. There were statistically significant reductions in the incidence of pain (41.43%) and neurological (37.50%) symptoms between follow-ups. Thus, our study demonstrates that combination antibiotics effectively relieve TBI symptoms with good patient tolerance.

Increased platelet reactivity as measured by plasma glycoprotein VI in gout.

Patients with gout have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. The glycoprotein VI (GPVI) receptor is found exclusively on platelets and megakaryocytes, is proteolytically cleaved upon platelet activation, and detectable in plasma as soluble GPVI (sGPVI). Therefore, elevated sGPVI is a marker of platelet activation and a risk marker for cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to assess platelet activation, as measured by plasma sGPVI level in gout. Blood samples were taken from patients with gout or osteoarthritis, and from healthy volunteers. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all participants. Blood samples were processed as double-spun platelet-poor plasma. Plasma sGPVI levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups. In total, 91 patients were included, 27 during gout flare, 41 with intercritical gout, 23 with osteoarthritis, and 53 healthy controls. Median (interquartile range) sGPVI levels were 6.51 ng/mL (4.52, 8.41) in gout flare, 3.58 ng/mL (2.11, 5.55) in intercritical gout, 2.73 ng/mL (2.17, 3.72) in osteoarthritis, and 2.19 ng/mL (1.72, 3.31) in healthy controls. Plasma sGPVI levels in both gout groups were significantly increased compared to healthy controls (p < 0.005 for each), in gout flare compared to osteoarthritis (p < 0.005), and in gout flare compared to intercritical gout (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in sGPVI levels in gout patients with and without tophi or in those prescribed colchicine. We conclude that patients with gout exhibit platelet hyperactivity as demonstrated by elevated sGPVI levels. Platelet activation is exacerbated in gout, especially during gout flares.

Soluble glycoprotein VI, a specific marker of platelet activation is increased in the plasma of subjects with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) have been shown to cause platelet activation in vitro, through the low-affinity immunoglobulin G (IgG) receptor (FcγRIIa) on platelets. Platelet activation via engagement of FcγRIIa results in proteolytic cleavage and shedding of platelet specific glycoprotein VI (GPVI) which can be detected in the plasma as soluble GPVI (sGPVI). We hypothesized that plasma levels of sGPVI would be increased among patients with seropositive RA as a consequence of antibody-induced platelet activation and GPVI shedding. METHODS: Samples from 84 patients with RA (65 seropositive and 19 seronegative) and 67 healthy controls were collected prospectively and analysed for sGPVI using a standardised ELISA. RESULTS: Patients with seropositive RA had significantly higher levels of sGPVI compared to seronegative RA and controls. Median (IQR) sGPVI levels were 4.2 ng/ml (3.2, 8.0) in seropositve RA, 2.2 ng/ml (1.5, 3.5) in seronegative RA and 2.2 ng/ml (1.6, 3.4) in controls (p<0.0001). sGPVI levels correlated with ACPA titres (r = 0.32, p = 0.0026) and with RF titres (r = 0.48, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Plasma sGPVI, a specific marker of platelet activation is increased among patients with seropositive RA.

Sulfasalazine and its metabolites inhibit platelet function in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of sulfasalazine and its metabolites on platelet function in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA). One hundred thirty-five consecutive patients with an established diagnosis of IA were screened. Those with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD), taking anti-platelet agents or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were excluded. A total of 32 patients were investigated, 15 taking sulfasalazine and 17 taking other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and no sulfasalazine. These two cohorts were compared to 15 patients with stable CVD on long-term aspirin. The effect of sulfasalazine and its metabolites on arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation was also tested in vitro in samples from healthy donors (n = 18). Demographics, CVD risk factors and disease activity indices were similar in the sulfasalazine and other DMARD groups. AA-induced platelet aggregation was significantly inhibited in the sulfasalazine group (9 ± 7 %) and comparable to that in the aspirin group (10 ± 6 %). In contrast, there was no effect on AA-induced platelet aggregation in the other DMARDs group (77 ± 12 %) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, sulfasalazine therapy had no effect on platelet aggregation in response to multiple other agonists. Sulfasalazine and its metabolites (5-aminosalicylic acid and sulfapyridine) exerted an additive and dose-dependent inhibitory effect on AA-induced platelet aggregation in vitro (p < 0.001). The inhibition of AA-induced platelet aggregation by sulfasalazine is comparable to that achieved by aspirin and is dependent on both sulfasalazine and its metabolites. This represents a potential mechanism that may contribute to the known cardioprotective effect of sulfasalazine in patients with IA.

Methotrexate in chronic-recurrent calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease: no significant effect in a randomized crossover trial.

INTRODUCTION: Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) may cause severe arthropathy, major joint destruction and treatment options are limited. The aim of this study was to test the therapeutic efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) in chronic or recurrent CPPD arthropathy. METHODS: Patients with CPPD arthropathy were randomized to receive either weekly subcutaneous injections of 15 mg/week of MTX or placebo (PBO) for three months, in a double-blind, crossover randomized controlled trial. Inclusion criteria comprised definite CPPD disease, recurrent arthritis or persistent polyarthritis, and an insufficient response to NSAIDs, glucocorticoids or colchicine. The primary outcome was an improvement in the disease activity scores based on 44 joints (DAS44). The analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: We randomized 26 patients, and compared 25 treatment periods on MTX with 21 treatment periods on PBO. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. The evolution of the DAS44 was not statistically significantly different between groups (median DAS44 decreased by -0.08 on MTX versus -0.13 on PBO, after three months, P = 0.44). Furthermore, pain levels remained stable in both groups (median change in VAS Pain -1 unit on MTX and 0 on PBO, P = 0.43), and none of the secondary outcomes was significantly different between the two groups. Minor adverse events (AE) did not differ in frequency between the groups, but the only serious AE occurred on MTX (bicytopenia). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial with MTX in this older population with chronic or recurrent CPPD arthropathy suggest no strong effect of MTX on disease activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT No: 2007-003479-37. Registered 26 April 2008.

Plasma fibrinogen along with patient-reported outcome measures enhances management of polymyalgia rheumatica: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to prospectively examine the responsiveness of a number of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), as well as their relationship to the biomarkers erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasma fibrinogen. METHODS: Sixty patients with PMR were divided into active (n = 25) or inactive (n = 35) disease groups based on symptoms; physician assessment; and the biomarkers ESR, CRP, and plasma fibrinogen. Groups underwent assessment at baseline and 6 weeks. Disease activity measures and relevant PRO measures were recorded. Measures of responsiveness were compared for all PRO and biomarkers. RESULTS: Visual analog scale disease activity (VASDA) and VAS quality of life (VASQOL) are more responsive to change in disease activity than VAS pain, morning stiffness, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and PMR-activity score (AS). Analysis of PMR-AS versus VASDA, VASQOL, and HAQ showed correlation coefficients of 0.87 (p < 0.001), 0.80 (p < 0.001), and 0.68 (p < 0.001), respectively. Receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis revealed VASDA to be more specific than either HAQ (0.95 vs 0.85; p < 0.001) or VASQOL (0.95 vs 0.93; p < 0.001) for the detection of response to treatment in active PMR. Overall, fibrinogen showed superior correlation coefficients with the various PRO than either of the standard biomarkers ESR or CRP. In addition, standardized response means for fibrinogen, ESR, and CRP were 1.63, 1.2, and 1.05, respectively, indicating that plasma fibrinogen was the most responsive biomarker for assessment of change in disease activity. CONCLUSION: VASDA and VASQOL are the most responsive PRO to changes in disease activity in PMR. In addition, plasma fibrinogen demonstrated greater responsiveness to changes in disease activity and superior correlation with the various PRO measures recorded than did the standard biomarkers ESR and CRP.

Plasma fibrinogen is an accurate marker of disease activity in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.

OBJECTIVE: The overall aim of this study was to establish whether plasma fibrinogen was a superior biomarker of disease activity in active PMR than the standard biomarkers, ESR and CRP. METHODS: Sixty patients with PMR were divided into active (n = 25) or inactive (n = 35) disease groups based on symptoms, physician assessment and biomarkers ESR and CRP. Plasma fibrinogen was assayed. Groups underwent assessment at baseline and 6 weeks. Disease activity as per the PMR activity score (PMR-AS) was recorded at all visits. Receiver operator curves (ROCs), predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated for all biomarkers. RESULTS: Disease activity measures improved significantly in the active group between weeks 1 and 6 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the activity scores at week 6 in the active group and the inactive group. Mean fibrinogen decreased from 5.2 to 3.5 g/l (normal <4 g/l) between weeks 1 and 6 in the active group. Mean ESR and CRP decreased from 59.6 to 24.3 mm/h (normal <30 mm/h) and 45.9 to 12.66 mg/l (normal <5 mg/l), respectively. Receiver operator curve analysis revealed fibrinogen to be more specific than either ESR or CRP for the detection of response to treatment in active PMR, with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 96%, respectively. Values above the upper limit of normal for fibrinogen, CRP and ESR were associated with likelihood ratios for active disease of 20.53, 2.9 and 2.8, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Plasma fibrinogen is at least as useful as CRP and ESR for the diagnosis of active PMR and more specific for confirmation of response to treatment than either ESR or CRP.

Platelet hyper-reactivity in active inflammatory arthritis is unique to the adenosine diphosphate pathway: a novel finding and potential therapeutic target.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of disease activity on platelet function in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA). METHODS: Ninety-six patients with an established diagnosis of IA (RA, PsA, seronegative SpA) were recruited. Patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus or receiving anti-platelet therapy were excluded. Demographic data, traditional CVD risk factors and medication use were recorded. Patients were characterized as active disease (n = 38) or control disease (n = 58) groups, respectively, based on internationally validated measures of disease activity [comprising serological markers (ESR, CRP, fibrinogen), patient measures (visual analogue scale of disease activity), evaluator global assessment and the 28-joint disease activity score]. Platelet function was assessed using a novel assay of platelet reactivity. Platelet aggregation to multiple concentrations of arachidonic acid, collagen, epinephrine, thrombin receptor activating peptide and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were measured simultaneously using a modification of light transmission aggregometry. RESULTS: The two groups (active vs control) were similar in terms of demographics and CVD risk factors. Anti-TNF-alpha therapy use was higher in the control group (P = 0.004), whereas NSAID use was higher in the active group (P = 0.001). There was a significant difference between the two groups in platelet response to ADP (P < 0.001). Platelet aggregation, in response to submaximal concentrations of ADP, was increased in the active disease group compared with the control group. There was no difference in platelet reactivity between the groups in response to any of the other agonists. CONCLUSION: Patients with active IA demonstrate enhanced platelet reactivity, unique to the ADP pathway. This potential pro-thrombotic bias may contribute to their increased cardiovascular risk.